Cluster analysis of effectiveness of labour market policy in the European Union
Keywords:labour market policy expenditure, effectiveness, efficiency, Ward’s method, k-means method
Research background: In the era of demographic changes and the need for rationalization of public expenditure, the European Union social policy promotes the activation approach. In addition, a growing importance of increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of public entities can be noticed. These phenomena are visible in the implementation of the labour market policy. However, the EU countries represent a different approach to spending public funds on issues related to the implementation of labour market policy.
Purpose of the article: The authors are presenting the main theoretical assumptions concerning effectiveness and efficiency of labour market policy. Moreover, in the paper the EU countries are classified in clusters according to their level of expenditure on different categories of LMP. A comparison of the situation over ten years ? in 2004 and 2014 ? has also been conducted. In 2004, ten new members entered the EU, and the year 2014 presents the most current data in the analyzed area.
Methods: As a research method cluster analysis was applied. Cross-country labour market situation throughout the EU is presented by the analysis of the Eurostat data. The countries are grouped in clusters following Ward's and k-means methods.
Findings & Value added: There is a need to work out a complex evaluation of labour market policies in the EU to provide comparative analysis of the EU countries (or groups of countries). It would allow to determine the level of development of the country in terms of the efficiency of labour market policies. The EU countries with the best labour market indicators represent diverse levels of LMP expenditure.
Aldenerfer, M. S., & Blashield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, 07-044.
Balabonienie, I., & Večerskiene, G. (2015). The aspects of performance measurement in public sector organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.544.
Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73(3).
Busk, H. (2016). Sanctions and the exit from unemployment in two different benefit schemes. Labour Economics, 42. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.09.001.
Cahuc, P., & Zylberberg, A. (2004). Labor economics. MIT Press, Brussels.
Calmfors, L. (1994). Active labour market policy and unemployment - a framework for the analysis of crucial design features. Economic Studies, 22.
Calmfors, L., Forslund, A., & Hemstrom, M. (2002). Does active labour market policy work? Lessons from the Swedish experiences. IFAU ? Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation. Working Paper, 4.
Carden, A., & Horwitz, S. (2013). Is market failure a sufficient condition for government intervention? Library of Economics and Liberty.
Dimian, G. C., Ileanu, B., Jablonsky, J., & Fabry, J. (2013). Analysis of European labour market in the crisis context. Prague Economic Papers, 1. doi: 10.18267/j.pep.440.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2001). A new welfare architecture for Europe? Report submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union.
Eurostat (2013). Labour market policy statistics. Methodology. European Union manuals and guidelines 13. Eurostat.
Gialis, S., & Leontidou, L. (2016). Antinomies of flexibilization and atypical employment in Mediterranean Europe: Greek, Italian and Spanish regions during the crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4). doi: 10.1177/0969776414538983.
Heckman, J., LaLonde, R., & Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.). Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 3, Part A. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03012-6.
Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions ? an overview. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1-2). doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(85)90139-3.
Helms, M. M. (2006). Encyklopedia of management. Thompson Gale. Detroit.
Jackman, R. (2002). Determinants of unemployment in Western Europe and possible policy responses. Paper presented on the 5th summer seminary of UNECE. Geneva.
Kumpikaite-Valiűniene, V., Rollnik-Sadowska, E., & Glińska, E. (2016). Education and future work attitudes of students in Poland and Lithuania: a comparative analysis. Society. Integration. Education, 4. doi: 10.17770/sie 2016vol4.1564.
Layard, R. (2004). Welfare-to-work and the New Deal. London: Centre Labour Markets Programme.
Layard, R. G. Nickell, S. J., & Jackman, R. (1991), Unemployment: macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindbeck, A., & Snower, D. (1986). Wage setting, unemployment and insider-outsider relations. American Economic Review, 76(2).
Macqeeen, J. B. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of 5-th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mandl, U., Dierx, A., & Ilzkovitz, F. (2008), The effectiveness and efficiency of public spendings. European Economy. Economic Papers, 301.
Marklund, H., & Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2016). The role of private companies in the Danish active labour market policy. Economics and Law, 15(2). doi: 10.12775/eip.2016.013.
Martin, J. (2000). What works among active labour market policies: evidence from OECD countries experiences. OECD Economic Studies, 30. doi: 10.1787/267308158388.
Martin, J., & Grubb, D. (2001). What works and for whom: a review of OECD countries experiences with active labour market policies. IFAU ? OECD. Working Paper, 14. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.348621.
Meager, N., & Evans, C. (1998). The evaluation of active labour market measures for the long-term unemployed. Employment and training papers. Geneva: ILO.
Pissarides, C. A. (1985). Taxes, subsidies and equilibrium unemployment. Review of Economic Studies, 52(1). doi: 10.2307/2297474.
Pollitt, Ch., & Bouckaert, G. (1999). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2013). Universal credit - welfare that works. Solutions for Podlaskie Voivodeship. In E. Rollnik-Sadowska (Ed.). Selected problems of social policy in border regions. Bialystok: BUT Publishing Office.
Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2014). The selected issues of labour market policy in Germany - implementation possibilities in Poland. Economics and Law, 13(1). doi: 10.12775/EiP.2014.005.
Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2015). Transformation of European labour market policy models-exepmlified by Demnark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Optimum - Studia Ekonomiczne, 5. doi: 10.15290/ose.2014.05.71.04.
Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2016). Young people in the European Union labour market. Latgale National Economy Research, 1(8). doi: 10.17770/lner2016vol1. 8.1482.
Rovelli, R., & Bruno, R. (2008). Labor market policies, institutions and employment rates in the EU-27. IZA Discussion Paper, 3502.
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating casual effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5). doi: 10.1037/h0037350.
Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 3. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511810725.009.
Schmid, G. (1998). Transitional labour markets: a new European employment strategy. Discussion Paper FS, I 98-206.
Schmid, G., O?Reilly, J., & Schomann, K. (Eds.) (1996). International handbook of labour market policy and evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Sengul, G. (2017). Effect of labor market policies on unemployment when firms adapt their recruitment strategy. Economic Modelling, 60. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.012.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector. New York-London: W.W. Norton & Company. .
Teo, T. (Ed.) (2014). Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research. Springer Science & Business Media.
Wozniak, M. (2016). Job placement agencies in an artificial labor market. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 10. doi: 10.5018/economic sejournal.ja.2016-29.