Factors of competitiveness in Polish companies in the Silesian Region in 2014–2016

Main Article Content

Grzegorz Głód
Olaf Flak


Research background: A lot of companies in the market create a variety of situations in which they compete with one another. At the same time companies crave for the same pool of demand, and in fact the money held by the buyers. Attempts to define the notion of com-petitiveness of the company appear frequently in scientific publications and in the research conducted by various institutions in different countries. The concept of competitiveness is used to determine the ratio of enterprise characteristics to these of its competitors, resulting from many internal features and the ability to deal with an external environment.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to present results of the Company Competitiveness Barometer, conducted in 2014, 2015 and 2016 on a group of more than 600 Polish companies. The Barometer is a theoretical basis for the integrated model of competi-tiveness designed by the authors of the article. The specific objectives of this article are: to provide an overview of the research methodology, to present the results of empirical studies of more than 600 Polish companies, to create an outline of the future direction of the research on competitiveness of enterprises by means of the Company Competitiveness Barometer.

Methods: The questionnaire used in the Company Competitiveness Barometer is built of 48 questions. 45 of them are related to the characteristics of the company that are affecting its competitiveness, and 3 questions are metric questions. The questionnaire can be found on the www.sensorium24.com website.

Findings & Value added: The research carried out from the point of view of the company’s employees, offer an opportunity to reflect and think about the competitiveness of their own organization and factors that are shaping it. The IT tool used makes it possible to compare own results with other companies participating in the survey.

Article Details

How to Cite
Głód, G., & Flak, O. (2017). Factors of competitiveness in Polish companies in the Silesian Region in 2014–2016. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.37


Aguiar, H., Pereira, C., Donaire, D., & Nascimento, P. (2017). Analysis of compet-itiveness in retail business clusters: adjustment of metrics through an applica-tion at the bom retiro retail fashion cluster. REGE - Revista de Gestão. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rege.2017.03.003.
Ambastha, A., & Momaya, K. (2004). Competitiveness of firms: review of theory, frameworks and models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1).
Aripin, I. A. A. (2017). The effect of entrepreneurship and regulation policy on competitive advantage. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4A).
Bednarz, J., Bielinski, T., Nikodemska-Wolowik, A., & Otukoya, A. (2017). Sources of the competitive advantage of family enterprises: an international approach focusing on China, Nigeria and Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(2). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050207.
Blair, J. P. (2004). How local competition for economic activity effects national competitiveness. Competitiveness Review, 14(2).
Borowiecki, R., & Siuta-Tokarska, B. (2016). The competitiveness of the SME enterprises in Poland in the view of self assessment of their owners and manag-ers. Przegląd Organizacji, 10.
Bugador, R. (2015). The competitive advantages and internationalization of emerging economy business groups. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1).
Donno, A. (2013). Multidimensional measures of firm competitiveness: a model-based approach. Gennaio: Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche “Paolo Fortu-nati”.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015). Features of Polish companies. Results of the company competitiveness barometer 2014. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(3). doi: 10. 12775/OeC.2015.024
Flak, O. (2014). A method of estimating the determinant of enterprise competitive-ness. In A. Nalepka & A. Ujwary-Gil (Eds.). Business and non-profit organiza-tions fading increased competition and growing customers' demands. Nowy Sącz: Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2009). Konkurencyjność przedsiębiorstwa. Pojęcia, modele, definicje (Eng. Company Competitiveness. Terms, models and definitions). Ka-towice: Wydawnictwo AE Katowice.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2012). The competitive will survive. Warszawa: Difin.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015). Results of the company competitiveness barometr 2014 in Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. 42(2). doi: 10.12775/AUNC_ZARZ.2015.023.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015). Verification of the relationships between the elements of an integrated model of competitiveness of the company. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.132.
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2015). Results of the company competitiveness barometr 2014 in Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici – Zarządzanie. 42(2).
Flak, O., & Głód, G. (2016). Factors of competitiveness in Polish and Czech com-panies in the Silesian-Moravian region in 2016. Proceedings of the internation-al scientific conference “Current problems of the corporate sector 2017”, De-partment of Business, Faculty of Business Management, University of Economics in Bratislava.
Koroteeva, N., Hasanov, E., Mushrub, V., Klochko, E., Bakharev, V. & Shi-chiyakh, R. (2016). The conditions of economic efficiency and competitiveness of tourism enterprises. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(8).
Kuznetsova, N. V., Rahimova, L. M., Gafurova, V. M., Simakov, D. B., Zino-vyeva, E. G., & Ivanova, L. A. (2017). External environment as a factor of en-suring the competitiveness of organizations in the regional market of medical services, European Research Studies Journal, 20(4A).
Lombana, J. (2011). Looking for a distinctive model with which to analyze com-petitiveness. ACR, 19(3-4).
Marin, L., Martín, P. J., Rubio, A. (2017). Doing good and different! The mediation effect of innovation and investment on the influence of CSR on competi-tiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 24(2). doi: 10.1002/csr.1412.
Martinez F., & Potluka O. (2015). Does the EU funding increase competitiveness of firms by supporting organizational changes? Journal of Competitiveness, 7(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.02.02
Mikolas, Z. (2016). Potenciál rodinného podnikání. In S. Majtán (Ed.). Aktualne problemy podnikovej sfery: zbornák vedeckých prác. Bratislava: Vydavateˇstvo EKONÓM.
Patrisia, D., & Dastgir, S. (2017). Diversification and corporate social performance in manufacturing companies. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1). doi: 10.1007/s40821-016-0052-6
Peña-Vinces, J. C., Acedo, F. J. & Roldán, J. L. (2014). Model of the international competitiveness of SMNEs for Latin American developing countries. European Business Review, 26(6).
Setyawan, A., Isa, M., Muhammad, F., & Nugroho, S. (2015). An assessment of SME competitiveness in Indonesia. Journal of Competitiveness, 7(2). doi: 10.7441/joc.2015.02.04.
Trapczynski, P., Jankowska, B., Dzikowska, M., & Gorynia, M. (2016). Identifica-tion of linkages between the competitive potential and competitive position of SMEs related to their internationalization patterns shortly after the economic crisis. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(4). doi: 10.15678/EBER.2016.040403.