Does system of local government subsidisation fulfil revenue equalisation function? Evidence from Poland

Main Article Content

Alicja Sekuła

Abstract

Research background: General grants in the system of local government finance should pursue five different functions. One of them is revenue equalization. This function is achieved if the revenue gap is reduced after the application of the subsidising mechanism. In addition, to be completed, the size of the support should be inversely proportional to own revenues.


Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to analyse the fulfilment of the revenue equalization function by general grants. Therefore, beside the theoretical analysis, which presents the general grants structure and the functions assigned to them, the article discusses the results of studies showing changes in the revenue gap after the application of the grant mechanism and the correlation between per capita own revenue and the amount of funds from selected parts (equalisation, balancing-regional, reserve, compensating) of the general grant. The following tentative research hypothesis was adopted: general grants fail to fulfil the revenue equalisation function.


Methods: Two research methods were applied to achieve the aim of the article and verify the research hypothesis: descriptive statistics and correlation — calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient.


Findings & Value added: Based on the analyses, it was concluded that, once the corrective and equalising mechanism was applied, the range between the extreme per capita revenue values was reduced by 40–50% on average, at all local government levels, i.e. at commune (including cities with county right), county and province levels, in each year from the period analysed, i.e. 2012–2016. The correlation between the sizes of revenue before and after budget subsidising is always negative, whereas the strength of the relationship ranged between low and significant, depending on the local government level. It was found that general grants do fulfil the revenue equalisation function, which contradicts the initially formulated research hypothesis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sekuła, A. (2017). Does system of local government subsidisation fulfil revenue equalisation function? Evidence from Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(4), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.32
Section
Articles

References

Bronić M., & Bajo, A. (2007). Assessments of the effectiveness of the Croatian fiscal equalisation model. Financial Theory and Practice, 31(1).
Bröthaler, J., & Getzner, M. (2011). Fiscal autonomy and total government ex-penditure: an Austrian case-study. International Advances in Economic Re-search, 17(2). doi: 10.1007/s11294-011-9301-8.
Eccleston, R., & Woolley, T. (2015). From Calgary to Canberra: resource taxation and fiscal federalism in Canada and Australia. Publius - The Journal of Federalism, 45(2). doi: 10.1093/publius/pju039.
Heinemann, A. (2012). Horizontal or vertical? The future of the German fiscal equalisation system. Wirtschaftsdienst, 92(7). doi: 10.1007/s10273-012-1406-z.
Islam, M., & Choudhury, S. (1990). Testing the exogeneity of grants to local gov-ernments. Canadian Journal of Economics, 23(3). doi: 10.2307/135654.
Local Data Bank. https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start.
Lotz, J. (2006). Accountability and control in the financing of local government in Denmark. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(2). doi: 10.1787/budget-v5-art11-en.
Ministry of Finance. Retrieved form http://www.mf.gov.pl/pl/ministerstwo-finansow/dzialalnosc/finanse-publiczne.
Oulasvirta, L. (1997). Real and perceived effects of changing the grant system from specific to general grants. Public Choice, 91(3/4). doi: 10.1023/A:1004987824891.
Petchey, J. (2011). Fiscal capacity equalisation of the Australian states. Australi-an Economic Review, 44(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2011.00636.x.
Peternek, P., & Kośny, M. (2011). Comments concerning correlation coefficient significance testing. Zeszyty Naukowe, 20.
Sekuła, A. (2009). System of specific grants for local government units in Poland. In M. Bucek, R. Capello, O. Hudec & P. Nijkamp (Eds.). 3rd Central Europe-an Conference in Regional Science. Kosice: Technical University. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1557.5842.
Sekuła, A. (2015). General grants and development – a relationship without a future? The effects of the structure of general grants on the development of local government units in Poland. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 13(4). doi: 10.4335/13.3.915-932(2015).
Sekuła, A., & Basińska, B. (2014). Why do subsidies not promote development? An attempt at identifying the reasons why general grants have no effect on in-vestment expenditures. Prace Naukowe Wrocław University of Economics, 331. doi: 10.15611/pn.2014.331.14.
Shah, A. (2016). Fiscal policies for coordinated urban-rural development and their relevance for China. Public Finance & Management, 16(1).
Starkie, D. (1984). The specific effect of specific road grants in South Australia. Australian Economic Papers, 23(42). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.1984 .tb00071.x.
Swianiewicz, P. (2016). Horizontal equalization of local government finance - European experience. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 63(1). doi: 10.7366/ 1509499516302.
Turley, G., Flannery, D. & McNena, S. (2015). A needs and resources assessment of fiscal equalisation in the Irish local government system. Economic & Social Review, 46(3).