Cooperation of slow cities as an opportunity for the development: an example of Polish National Cittaslow Network

Keywords: network of cities, Cittaslow, cooperation of slow cities, small city’s development, regional development

Abstract

Research background: Many demographic, social, spatial, economic and infrastructural problems have accumulated in small cities in Poland. It seems that the situation of the smallest cities located farther away from large cities and metropolises is particularly difficult. A chance for their development may arise from cooperation within a network of cities which associates cities similar in size, paradigm and vision of development, such as the ‘Cittaslow — International network of cities where living is good’.

Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to identify main cooperation areas for slow cities in Poland. An analysis was made of the cooperation between 28 cities that are members of the Polish National Cittaslow Network.

Methods: The research applied a critical review of the literature and a diagnostic survey method. The survey was carried out with a standardised questionnaire. It was addressed to mayors of all member cities of the Polish National Cittaslow Network. The study was made in 2018.

Findings & Value added: The cooperation of cities belonging to the Cittaslow network in Poland is becoming more and more complex and concerns mainly the development of tourism and urban promotion. The shared logo and promotion of the urban network, organization of cultural events, exchange of experience, implementation of a supralocal revitalization program for several ‘slow cities’ from Warmia and Mazury, are examples of active cooperation. This proves that the competition between cities can be transformed into effective coopetition of cities. The idea of ‘slow’, which is fundamental to the development of the Cittaslow networked cities, creates an opportunity to design an individual development model for small cities that could apply to cities in Poland and elsewhere in the world.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batyk, I., & Woźniak, M. (2019). Benefits of belonging to the Cittaslow network in the opinion of residents of member cities. Economic and Regional Studies, 12(1). doi: 10.2478/ers-2019-0006.

Cittaslow International Charter (2017). Retrieved from http://www.cittaslow.org/ sites/default/files/content/page/files/257/charter_cittaslow_en_05_18.pdf (7.03.2019).

Cittaslow International List. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.cittaslow.org/sites/ default/files/content/page/files/246/cittaslow_list_september_2018.pdf (20.02.2019).

Çiçek, M., Ulu, S., & Uslay, C. (2019). The impact of the slow city movement on place authenticity, entrepreneurial opportunity, and economic development. Journal of Macromarketing, 39(4). doi: 10.1177/0276146719882767.

Farelnik, E., & Stanowicka, A. (2016). Smart city, slow city and smart slow city as development models of modern cities. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 11(4). doi: 10.31648/oej.2938.

Farelnik, E., Stanowicka, A., & Wierzbicka, W. (2017). International cooperation between cities based on the example of the Cittaslow network. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 12(4). doi: 10.31648/oej.2842.

Mayer, H., & Knox, P. L. (2006). Slow cities: sustainable places in a fast world. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00298.x.

Mazur-Belzyt, K. (2017). ‘Slow’ revitalization on regional scale, the example of an integrated investment project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/5/052040.

McGrath, P., & Sharpley, R. (2018). Slow travel and tourism. New concept or new label? In M. Clancy (Ed.). Slow tourism, food and cities. Pace and the search for the ’good life’. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315686714.

Meijers, E. (2005). Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts? Urban Studies, 42(4). doi: 10.1080/00420980500060384.

Mingaleva, Z., Sheresheva, M., Oborin, M., & Gvarliani, T. (2017). Networking of small cities to gain sustainability. Enterpreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(1). doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.5.1(12).

Polish national strategy of regional development 2010–2020. (2010). Retrieved from https://www.miir.gov.pl/media/3337/KSRR_13_07_2010.pdf (11.03.2019).

Presenza, A., Abbate, T., & Perano, M. (2015). The Cittaslow certification and its effects on sustainable tourism governance. Enlightening Tourism. A Pathmaking Journal, 5(1). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2827705.

Rysz, K., & Mazurek, K. (2015). Contemporary foundations of the theory of urban development – case study smart, slow and compact city theory. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 3(4). doi: 10.1515/environ-2015-0072.

Shi, Y., Zhai, G., Zhou, S., Chen, W., & He, Z. (2019). Slow city development in China: process, approaches and acceptability. Third World Quarterly, 40(7). doi: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1594181.

Strategy of tourism development for the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship until 2025 (2016). Retrieved from https://bip.warmia.mazury.pl/409/strategia-rozw oju-turystyki-wojewodztwa-warminsko-mazurskiego-do-roku-2025.html (11.03.2019).

Strzelecka, E. (2018). Network model of revitalization in the Cittaslow cities of the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodship. Barometr Regionalny, 16(3).

Supralocal revitalization program of the cities of the Cittaslow network of the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship (2018). Olsztyn.

Szmigiel-Rawska, K. (2017). Theories of territorial cooperation. Municipium oeconomicus versus municipium reciprocans. Warsaw: Scholar.

Taylor, P. (2001). Specification of the world city network. Geographical Analysis, 3(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00443.x.

Tocci, G. (2018). Slow and intelligent cities. When slow is also smart. In M. Clancy (Ed.). Slow tourism, food and cities. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/ 9781315686714.

Üstündağlı, E., Baybars, M., & Güzeloğlu, E. B. (2015). Collaborative sustainability: analyzing economic and social outcomes in the context of Cittaslow. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(1).

Wierzbicka, W. (2020). Socio-economic potential of cities belonging to the Polish National Cittaslow Network. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(1). doi: 10.24136/ oc.2020.009.

Yurtseven, H. R., & Kaya, O. (2011). Slow tourists: a comparative research based on Cittaslow principles. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(2).

Zadęcka, E. (2018). ‘Slow city’ as a local development model. Economic and Regional Studies, 11(3). doi: 10.2478/ers-2018-0027.

Zawadzka, A. K. (2017). Making small towns visible in Europe: the case of Cittaslow network – the strategy based on sustainable development. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue. doi: 10.24193/tras.SI2017.6.

Published
2020-06-22
How to Cite
Farelnik, E. (2020). Cooperation of slow cities as an opportunity for the development: an example of Polish National Cittaslow Network. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(2), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.011
Section
Articles