Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries

Keywords: Unfair Commercial Practice Directive, harmonization, legislation, case law, misleading

Abstract

Research background: Modern European integration focuses on competition in the internal single market, embracing both competitiveness and consumer protection, and it aims at full harmonization in this arena. The hallmark, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive from 2005, aims to overcome diverse social, political, legal and economic traditions. Is the implied protection against misleading practices an opportunity or a threat for Central European Regions?

Purpose of the article: The primary purpose is to comparatively describe and critically assess the transposed legal frameworks. The secondary purpose is to study and evaluate their coherence in the light of the case law and their impact in Central Europe, in particular whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, i.e. boosting competitiveness and innovation along with consumer welfare.

Methods: The cross-disciplinary and multi-jurisdictional nature of this paper, and its dual purposes, implies the use of Meta-Analysis, of various interpretation techniques suitable for legal texts and judicial decisions, of the critical comparison and of a holistic assessment of approaches and impacts. Legislation and case law are explored and the yielded knowledge and data are confronted with a field search and case studies. The dominating qualitative research and data are complemented by the quantitative research and data.

Findings & Value added: For over one decade, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive has required full harmonization of the protection against, among other items, misleading commercial practices, by legislatures and judges in the EU. The exploration pursuant to the two purposes suggests that this ambitious legislative and case law project entails a number of transposition approaches with varying levels of coherence, importance and impacts on the competitiveness and innovation of business and consumer welfare in Central Europe. Therefore, full harmonization should be either readjusted or relaxed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Areeda, Ph. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5).

Azolai, L. (2011). The force and forms of European legal integration. EUI Working Papers, 2011/6. Retrieved from http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream /handle/1814/16894 /LAW_2011_06.pdf?sequence=1 (1.1.2017)

Balcerzak, A. P. (2015). Europe 2020 strategy and structural diversity between old and new member states. Application of zero unitarization method for dynamic analysis in the years 2004-2013. Economics & Sociology, 8(2). doi: 10.14254/2071- 789X.2015/8-2/14.

Balcerzak, A. P. (2016a). Technological potential of European economy. Proposition of measurement with application of multiple criteria decision analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 12(3). doi: 10.14254/1800-5845.2016/12-3/1.

Balcerzak, A. P. (2016b). Fiscal burden in the European Union member states. Economic Annals - XXI, 161(9-10). doi: 10.21003/ea.V161-01.

Bočková, N., & Meluzín, T. (2016). Electronics industry: R&D investments as possible factors of firms competitiveness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.468.

Chirita, A. D. (2014). A legal-historical review of the EU competition rules. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 63(2). doi: 10.1017/S00205 89314000037.

Chronopoulos, A. (2014). Legal and economic arguments for the protection of advertising value through trade mark law. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 4(4). doi: 10.4337/qmjip.2014.04.01.

Cvik, E. D., & MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2016). Implementation of directive 2014/17/EU and its impact on EU and member states markets, from not only a Czech perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.472.

Çolak, M. S., & Ege, A. (2013). An assessment of EU 2020 strategy: too far to reach? Social Indicators Research, 110(2). doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9950-2.

Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5). doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646779.

Erixon, F. (2010). The Europe 2020 strategy: time for Europe to think again. European View, 9. doi: 10.1007/s12290-010-0120-8.

European Commission (2010). COM (2010) 2020 Communication from the Commission Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20 BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20ve rsion.pdf (8.08.2018).

Flisikowski, K., & Kucharska, W. (2018). The condition of economies. Do most valuable global brands matter?. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2). doi:10.24136/eq.2018.013.

Jindrichovska, I., & Purcarea, I. (2011). CSR and environmental reporting in the Czech Republic and Romania: country comparison of rules and practices. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 10(2).

Jindrichovska, I., & Kubickova, D. (2017). The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules–Evidence from the Czech Republic. Accounting in Europe, 14(1-2).

Knapp, V. (1995). Teorie práva. Praha, ČR: C. H. Beck.

Lajtkepová, E. (2016). Differences and similarities in the indebtedness of EU member states after last financial crisis. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(4). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.031.

Landmesser, J. (2019). Differences in income distributions for men and women in the European Union countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy,14(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.004.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2012). And the best top level domain for European enterprises is ... . International And Comparative Law Review, 12(2).

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2014). Selected current aspects and issues of European integration. Ostrava: Key Publishing.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2017). European myriad of approaches to parasitic commercial practices. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2). doi: 10.24136/oc.v 8i2.11.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2018). Fostering innovation – a myth or reality of the EU in 2018. In M. Staníčková, L. Melecký, E. Kovářová & K. Dvoroková (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on European integration 2018. Ostrava.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019a). The fair analysis of the case law of the court of justice of EU on the unfair commerical practices. Acta Academica Karviniensia, 19(1).

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019b). R&D expenditure and innovation in the EU and selected member states. JEMI, 15(1). doi: 10.7341/20191511.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019c). Corporate social responsibility information in annual reports in the EU – Czech case study. Sustainability, 11. doi: 10.3390/su11010237.

MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Císařová, J., & Beneš, M. (2017). The misleading perception of the purpose of the protection against misleading advertising by the EU law and its impact in the Czech Republic. Lawyer Quarterly, 7(3).

Margoni, T. (2016). The protection of sports event in the EU: property, intellectual property, unfair competition and special forms of protection. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(4). doi: 10.1007/ s40319-016-0475-8.

Melecký, L. (2018). The main achievements of the EU structural funds 2007–2013 in the EU member states: efficiency analysis of transport sector. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.015.

Ng, C. W. (2016). The law of passing off – goodwill beyond goods. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47(7). doi: 10.1007/s403 19-016-0510-9.

Osuji, O. K. (2011). Business-to-consumer harassment, unfair commercial practices directive and the UK – a distorted picture of uniform harmonisation? Journal of Consumer Policy, 34. doi: 10.1007/s10603-011-9175-4.

Pakšiová, R. (2016). CSR reporting in Slovakia. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on European integration 2016. Ostrava: VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava.

Pasimeni, F., & Pasimeni, P. (2016). An institutional analysis of the Europe 2020 strategy. Social Indicator Research, 127(3). doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1013-7.

Piekarczyk, A. (2016). Contemporary organization and a perspective on integration and development. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.027.

Polcyn, J. (2018). Human development level as a modifier of education efficiency. Management-Poland, 22(2). doi: 10.2478/manment-2018-0030.

Pohulak-Żoledowska, E. (2016). Innovation in Contemporary Economies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2016.026.

Rogalska, E. (2018). Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.034.

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research – a practical handbook. London: SAGE.

Staníčková, M. (2017). Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i3.20.

Stec, M., & Grzeby, M. (2017). The implementation of the Strategy Europe 2020 objectives in European Union countries: the concept analysis and statistical evaluation. Quality & Quantity, 52(1). doi: 10.1007/s11135-016-0454-7.

Teasuro, C., & Russo, C. (2008). Unfair commercial practices and misleading and comparative advertising: an analysis of the harmonization of EU legislation in view of the Italian implementation of the rules. Competition Policy International, 4(1). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00047-0.

Turečková, K., & Nevima, J. (2017). European funds – risk management by public colleges. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D, 24(41).

Vivant, M. (2016). Building a common culture IP? International revue of intellectual property and competition law, 47(3). doi: 10.1007/s40319-016-0472-y.

Żelazny, R., & Pietrucha, J. (2017). Measuring innovation and institution: the creative economy index. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi:10.24136/eq.v12i1.3.

Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2019). Harmonization of the protection against misleading commercial practices: ongoing divergences in Central European countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2019.012
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)