The main achievements of the EU structural funds 2007–2013 in the EU member states: efficiency analysis of transport sector

Main Article Content

Lukáš Melecký

Abstract

Research background: The European Union currently provides financial support to the Member States through various financial tools from European Structural and Investment Funds 2014–2020, and previously from the EU Structural Funds. In both terminologies, the funds represent the main instrument of EU Cohesion Policy to sustain territorial development, to increase competitiveness and to eliminate regional disparities. The overall impact of EU Funds depends on the structure of funding and absorption capacity of the country.


Purpose of the article: The efficiency of funding across the EU Member States is a fundamental issue for EU development as a whole. The Author considers deter-mining the efficiency of EU Funds as an issue of high importance, and therefore this paper provides a contribution to the debate on the role of EU Cohesion Policy in the Member States. The paper focuses on territorial effects of relevant EU Funds in programming period 2007–2013 in infrastructure through efficiency analysis.


Methods: Efficiency analysis is based on data at the country level, originating from ex-post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2007–2013 and representing the input and output variables to analyse whether the goal of fostering growth in the target countries have been achieved with the funds provided, and whether or not more resources generated stronger growth effects in transport accessibility. The paper deals with comparative cross-country analysis, descriptive analysis of dataset and multiple-criteria approach of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the form of output-oriented BCC VRS model of efficiency and output-oriented APM VRS subsequently model of super-efficiency.


Findings & Value added: The paper aims to test the factors of two inputs and five outputs, trying to elucidate the differences obtained by the Member States in effective use of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in the transport sector. The paper determines if the countries have been more efficient in increasing their levels of competitive advantages linked with transport. Preliminary results reveal that most countries with a lower amount of funding achieve higher efficiency, especially countries in a group of so-called “old EU Member States”, i.e. group EU15.

Article Details

How to Cite
Melecký, L. (2018). The main achievements of the EU structural funds 2007–2013 in the EU member states: efficiency analysis of transport sector. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(2), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.015
Section
Articles

References

Aiello, F., & Pupo, V. (2012). Structural funds and the economic divide in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.10.006.
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10). doi: 10.1287/ mnsc.39.10.1261.
Annoni, P., & Dijkstra, L. (2013). EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2013. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Polverari, L., & Charles, D. (2013). Evaluation of the main achievements of Cohesion Policy programmes and projects over the longer term in 15 selected regions (from 1989-1993 programme period to the present). Final Report to the European Commission (DG Regio) – (2011.CE.16.B.AT.015). Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde. London: London School of Economics.
Balcerzak, A. P., Kliestik, T., Streimikiene, D., & Smrčka L. (2017). Non-parametric approach to measuring the efficiency of banking sectors in European Union Coun-tries. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 14(7). doi: 10.12700/APH.14.7.2017.7.
Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2010). Going NUTS: the effect of EU structural funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9-10). doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.006.
Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., & von Ehrlich, M. (2012). Too much of a good thing? On the growth effects of the EU's regional policy. European Economic Review, 56(4). doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.03.001.
Brzakova, K., & Pridalova, K. (2016). Comparison of investment costs for companies using EU structural funds and investment incentives. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(2016). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30283-0.
Cardenete, M. A., & Delgado, M.C. (2015). A simulation of impact of withdrawal European funds on Andalusian economy using a dynamic CGE model: 2014–20. Economic Modelling, 45(2015). doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.09.021.
Caves, D. W., Christensen, L., & Diewert, E. W. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50(6). doi: 10.2307/1913388.
Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – thirty years on. European Journal of Operation Research, 192(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032.
Disjktra, L., Annoni, A., & Kozovska, K. (2011). A new regional competitiveness index: theory, methods and findings. European Commission, Regional Policy Working Paper, 2/2011.
Dragan, G. (2012). EU Structural Instruments key component in improving the Romanian macroeconomic stability? Procedia Economics and Finance, 3(2012). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00294-8.
Enguix, M. R. M., García, J. G., & Gallego, J. C. G. (2012). An impact analysis of the European structural funds on the variation of the rate of employment and productivity in objective 1 regions. European Planning Studies, 20(4). doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.665038.
EUR-Lex (1957). Treaty of Rome (EEC). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3Axy0023 (23.02.2017).
European Commission (2016). Evaluations of the 2007-2013 programming period: ex post evaluation of the ERDF and CF: key outcomes of cohesion policy in 2007-2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/ publications/evaluations?title=Work+Package+1+&themeId=0&tObjectiveId =ALL&typeId=4&countryId=0&periodId=2&fundId=0&policyId=5&languageCode=en&search=1 (20.02.2017).
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3). doi: 10.2307/2343100.
Gherman, M. G. (2014). An examination of the Romanian state budget regarding the European funds: co-financing provisions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014). doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.770.
Górniak, J. (2016). The spatial autocorrelation analysis for transport accessibility in selected regions of the European Union. Comparative Economic Research, 19(5). doi: 10.1515/cer-2016-0036.
Grmanová, E., & Pukala, R. (2018). Efficiency of insurance companies in the Czech Republic and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1). doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.004.
Hapenciuc, C. V., Morosan, A. A., & Arionesei, G. (2013). Absorption of structural funds international comparisons and correlations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6(2013). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00139-1.
Healy, A., & Bristow, G. (2013). Economic crisis and the structural funds. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Press/ PressReleases/2013-Article/OD-ECR2-article_Economic-Crisis-and-the-Struct ural-Funds.pdf (22.02.2017).
Katsarova, I. (2013). The (low) absorption of EU structural funds. Library Briefing: Library of the European Parliament, 130544REV1.
Lucian, P. (2014). Absorption of European funds by Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16(2014). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00838-7.
Melecký, L. (2017). Efficiency analysis of ERDF and CF co-financed programmes focusing on the transport in member states of the European Union. In A. P. Balcerzak, M. B. Pietrzak (Eds.). Proceedings of the 9th international conference on applied economics contemporary issues in economy: quantitative methods. Toruň: Institute of Economic Research & Polish Economic Society.
Melecký, L. (2013). Use of DEA approach to measuring efficiency trend in old EU member states. In A. Kocourek (Ed.). Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Liberec Economic Forum. Liberec: Technical University Liberec.
Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (2014). Regional efficiency evaluation by DEA approach: comparison of selected EU15 and EU13 countries. In I. Honová (Ed.). Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on European integration. Ostrava: VŠB-Technical University Ostrava.
Mohl, P., & Hagen, T. (2010). Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5). doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.005.
Rogalska, E. R., Pietrzak, M. B., & Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Do European funds for sustainable growth policy support convergence process?. In T. Loster & T. Pavelka (Eds.). The 11th international days of statistics and economics. Confer-ence proceedings. Prague: Melandrium.
Rubini, L. (2010). The definition of subsidy and state Aid: WTO and EC in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Staníčková, M. (2017). Can the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy goals be efficient? The challenge for achieving social equality in the European Union. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i3.20.
Staníčková, M. (2014). Measuring the efficiency of EU13 NUTS 2 regions based on RCI approach. In V. Klímová & Žítek, V. (Eds.). In 17th international colloquium on regional sciences. Brno: Masaryk University.
Staníčková, M., Melecký, L. (2016). Malmquist index approach to efficiency analysis in selected old and new EU Member States. ER-CEREI, 19(2016). doi: 10.7327/cerei.2016.09.02.
Sucháček, J. (2013). Investment location from the perspective of urban and regional activities in the Czech Republic. In M. Čulík (Ed.). In 9th international scientific conference on financial management of firms and financial institutions location. Ostrava: VŠB-TU Ostrava.
Štreimikienė, D. (2016). Review of financial support from EU structural funds to sustainable energy in Baltic States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58(2016). doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.306.
Tatulescu, A., & Patruti, A. (2014). Structural funds and economic crises: Romania’s absorption paradox. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16(2014). doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00775-8.
Tödtling–Schönhofer, H., Hamza, Ch., Resch, A., Polverari, L., & Bachtler, J. (2011). Impact and effectiveness of the structural funds and EU policies aimed at SMEs in the regions. European Parliament, Working Study IP/B/REGI/FWC/2010-002/LOT1/C1/SC1.
Toloo, M., Barat, M., & Masoumzadeh, A. (2015). Selective measures in data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1). doi: 10.1007/s10479-014-1714-3.