A model assessing innovativeness of administration units awarding public contracts as a tool to conduct economic policy of the state


  • Arkadiusz Borowiec Poznan University of Technology




macroeconomic policy, policy making, innovations, public procurement


In today's market economy factors concerning knowledge, new technologies and innovative solutions are essential for economic development. However, the Polish economy, despite its high innovation potential compared to other European Union countries, is characterized by a very low level of innovativeness. Implementing this potential is conditioned with an appropriate economic policy of the state and rational approach to its resources and legal solutions. One of the possibilities of such an action is the use of public procurement instrument through which it is possible to more effectively create demand for innovative products and services. As shown by literature studies, the achievements of the subject literature associated with the creation of demand for innovations by public administration in Poland have been very modest. This gap is recognized the article and it attempts to build a model for assessing the innovativeness of these units. Network thinking methodology was used to build the model. As a result, after the identification of factors affecting the conduct of an innovative public procurement, a network of links was established between them and examined in terms of type, intensity and duration of exposure. Building a model according to the methodology, the opinions of experts have been used along with long-term observations conducted in the course of participation in all kinds of conferences and trainings. The model was also subjected to validation in two selected units.


Download data is not yet available.


Audretsch D.B.(1995), The Propensity to Exit and Innovation, Review of Industrial Organization. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01026884
Borowiec A. (2008). Zamówienia publiczne jako instrument wspierania małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Poznań: Politechnika Poznańska.
Freeman Ch. (1994). The Economics of Technical Change. Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Gmurczyk J.(2014). Innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki. Stan obecny i rekomendacje. Warszawa: Instytut Obywatelski
Malerba F., Orsenigo L.(1996). Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-specific. Research Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3
Romer P.M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261420.
Rostkowski T. (2014). Nowoczesne metody zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi. Warszawa: Difin.
Simpson P.M., Siguaw J.A., Enz C.A.(2006). Innovation orientation outcomes: The good and the bad. Journal of Business Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.001.
Schumpeter J., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1995
Urząd Zamówień Publicznych (2014). Sprawozdanie o funkcjonowaniu systemu zamówień publicznych w 2013 roku. Warszawa
Whiddett S., Hollyforde S.(2003). Modele kompetencyjne w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.




How to Cite

Borowiec, A. (2015). A model assessing innovativeness of administration units awarding public contracts as a tool to conduct economic policy of the state. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQUIL.2015.015



Growth based on innovations