Does income inequality matter for CO2 emissions in Russian regions?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.019

Keywords:

climate change, CO2 emissions, income inequality, economic development, environmental Kuznets curve

Abstract

Research background: Intensive economic growth in Russian regions during recent decades has been associated with numerous environmental issues, particularly increasing CO2 emissions, as well as income inequality. To achieve sustainable development, it is necessary to resolve these issues.

Purpose of the article: To shed light on the impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions based on Russian regional data covering the years 2004?2018.

Methods: Gini index and decile dispersion ratio are used to measure income inequality. To study the impact of income inequality on CO2 emissions in the Russian regions, we estimate econometric models with fixed and random effects and apply GMM method. We test the hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve to determine the impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions.

Findings & value added: The results show that CO2 emissions increase in tandem with growth in income inequality between 10% of people with the lowest income and 10% of people with the highest income. Simultaneously, CO2 emissions decrease with growth of Gini coefficient. The hypothesis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve was confirmed based on GMM method. Our findings underscore that the activities of the extraction and manufacturing sectors, as well as energy consumption, increase CO2 emissions. The chief significance of this paper is the finding that large income gap between extremely rich and extremely poor population cohorts increases CO2 emissions. This implies that economic policy aimed at reducing income inequality in Russian regions will also reduce CO2 emissions, especially if accompanied by increased use of environmentally friendly technologies. From the international perspective, our research can be extended to study other countries and regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Mamun, M., Sohag, K., Hannan Mia, M. A., Salah Uddin, G., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Regional differences in the dynamic linkage between CO2 emissions, sectoral output and economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 1?11. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.091.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277?297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.

Atkinson, A. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244?263.

Aye, G. C. (2020). Wealth inequality and CO2 emissions in emerging economies. The case of BRICS. United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research ? WIDER Working Paper, 161.

Baloch, A., S. Z. Shah, Z. M. Noor, & H. B. Magsi (2018). The nexus between income inequality, economic growth and environmental degradation in Pakistan. GeoJournal, 83(2), 207?222. doi: 10.1007/s10708-016-9766-3.

Borghesi, S. (2006). Income inequality and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Environment. In M. Basili, M. Franzini & A. Vercelli (Eds.). Inequality and collective action. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bowles, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: was Thorsten Veblen right? Economic Journal, 115(507), F397?F412. doi: 10.1111/j.1 468-0297.2005.01042.x.

Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(3), 169?178. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8.

Boyce, J. K. (2008). Is inequality bad for environment? Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 15, 267?288. doi: 10.4337/9781782547679.000 09.

Burakov, D., & Bass, A. (2019). Institutional determinants of environmental pollution in Russia: A non-linear ARDL approach. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 7(1), 510?524. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(36).

Chancel, L., & Piketty, Th. (2015). Carbon and inequality: from Kyoto to Paris. Trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998?2013) & prospects for an equitable adaptation fund. WID.world Working Paper Series, 2015/7.

Gao, Y., Li, M., Xue, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluation of effectiveness of China?s carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation. Energy Economics, 90(C). doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872.

Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353?377. doi: 10.2307/2118 443.

Grunewald, N., Klasen, S., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., & Muris, C. (2017). The trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecological Economics, 142, 249?256. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.034.

Hao, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang Q. (2016). Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China?s provincial panel data. Ecological Indicators, 67, 533?542. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.025.

Hartwell, C. A., Otrachshenko, V., & Popova, O. (2021). Waxing power, waning pollution: the effect of COVID-19 on Russian environmental policymaking. Ecological Economics, 184, 107003. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.1070 03.

Ivanova, V. (2019). GRP and environmental pollution in Russian regions: spatial econometric analysis. Quantile, 14, 53?62.

Jorgenson, A. K., Schor, J. B., & Huang, X. (2017). Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997-2012. Ecological Economics, 134, 40?48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016.

Kasuga, H., & Takaya, M. (2017). Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3689?3701. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.10.099.

Ketenci, N. (2018). The environmental Kuznets Curve in the case of Russia. Russian Journal of Economics, 4(3), 249?265. doi: 10.3897/j.ruje.4.28482.

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1?28.

Li, R., & Jiang, R. (2019). Is carbon emission decline caused by economic decline? Empirical evidence from Russia. Energy & Environment, 30(4), 672?684. doi: 10.1177/0958305X18802786.

Liu, C., Jiang, Y., & Xie R. (2019). Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission in the US? Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 380?387. doi: 10.1016/J.J CLEPRO.2019.01.242.

Mariev, O. S., Davidson, N. B., & Emelyanova, O. S. (2020). The impact of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions in the regions of Russia. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 19(3), 286?309. doi: 10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3 .014.

Pao, H-T, Yu, H-C, & Yang, Y-H (2011). Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy, 36(8), 5094?5100. doi: 10.1016/j. energy.2011.06.004.

Podobedova, L. (2020, May 25). Russia has set a five-year record for air pollution. RBC. Retrieved from https://www.rbc.ru/business/25/05/2020/5ec6a0b39a79 47d276ceca8f (22.10.2020).

Ravallion, M., Heil, M., & Jalan, J. (2000). Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(4), 651?669. doi: 10.1093/oep/52.4.651.

Rojas-Vallejos, J., & Lastuka, A. (2020). The income inequality and carbon emissions trade-off revisited. Energy Policy, 139, 1?10. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.1 11302.

Slobodenyuk, E. D., & Mareeva, S. V. (2020). Relative poverty in Russia: evidence from different thresholds, social indicators research. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 151(1), 135?153. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02364-1.

Sohag, K., Mariev, O., & Davidson, N. (2021). Revising environmental Kuznets Curve in Russian regions: role of environmental policy stringency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 52873?52886. doi: 10.1007 /s11356-021-14515-z.

Theil, H. (1967). Economics information theory. Economic Journal, 79(315), 601?602. doi: 10.2307/2230396.

Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 2, 147?160. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8.

Vornobytskyy, M. S., & Boyce, J. K. (2010). Economic inequality and environmgnal quality: evidence of pollution shifting in Russia. PERI, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Working paper series, 217.

Wang, N., Zhu, H., Guo, Y., & Peng, Ch. (2018). The heterogeneous effect of democracy, political globalization, and urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in G20 countries: evidence from panel quantile regression. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194(1), 54?68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.092.

Wiesmeth, H. (2020). Systemic change: the complexity of business in a circular economy. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(4), 47?60. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.47.60.

Xie, Q., & Liu, J. (2019). Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy, 186, 1?13. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115868.

Xu, B. (2016). A quantile regression analysis of China's provincial CO2 emissions: Where does the difference lie? Energy Policy, 98, 328?342. doi: 10.1016/j.enpo l.2016.09.003.

Yang, X., Lou, F., Sun, M., Wang, R., & Wang, Y. (2017). Study of the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the economic growth of Russia based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Applied Energy, 193, 162?173. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.03.

Zemtsov, S., Barinova, V., Kidyaeva, V. M., & Lanshina, T. A. (2019). Ecological efficiency and sustainable regional development in Russia during the 20 years of resource-based growth. Economic Policy, 14(6), 1?30.

Zheng, J., Zheng Mi, Zh., Coffman, D., Milcheva, S., Shan, Y., Guan, D., & Wang, Sh. (2019). Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Economics, 81(C), 25?36. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Davidson, N., Mariev, O., & Turkanova, S. (2021). Does income inequality matter for CO2 emissions in Russian regions?. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(3), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2021.019

Issue

Section

Articles