Institutional efficiency versus stability of local governments in basic areas of activity: the case of Poland

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.021

Keywords:

institutional efficiency of local governments, stability of tasks, activity of local government, synthetic measure

Abstract

Research background: In the last decade, the importance of institutions in determining economic processes and the economic growth is increasingly emphasized. Only a few papers deal with the efficiency of institutions, especially at a local level. Thus, a question arises whether the local authorities, in their pursuit of performing the assigned tasks, make every effort to attain a high level of efficiency?

Purpose of the article: The aim of the paper was to determine the relationships between institutional efficiency and identified areas of stability achieved by local governments in their basic roles. Supplementary aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the type of a municipality (urban, rural or mixed urban-rural) and the efficiency and stability of undertaken tasks. A research hypothesis was put forth, assuming that the institutional efficiency of municipal governments depends on the level of stability in basic areas of activity pursued by a given municipality. Supplementary aim of this study was to analyze and assess the relationship between the type of a municipality (urban, rural or mixed urban-rural) and the efficiency and stability of undertaken tasks.

Methods: An accumulated synthetic index of institutional efficiency and partial indices of efficiency in five areas: economic and spatial, financial, administrative, human resources management in municipal offices, provision of social, cultural and educational services, were derived from data acquired from public statistics (Local Data Bank) and from direct investigations conducted in 2015/2016 in 1220 municipalities out of 2479 ones present in Poland. The method for obtaining the index was linear ordering of multi-feature objects.

Findings & Value added: The analyses have confirmed the hypothesis assuming that there is a relationship between the institutional efficiency of local governments and stability of the tasks they performed. These dependences varied in individual provinces of Poland. It is more beneficial for local governments to raise stability by attaining some improvement in these areas where it is low, but not at the expense of those areas where it is high. A specific group of municipalities consisted of urban-rural communities. Their complex and diverse structure must meet the challenge of performing their tasks in specific conditions (urban and rural areas).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5). doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369.

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.). Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5). doi: 10.1016/j. socec.2007.03.007.

Álvarez-Díaz, M., & Miguez, G. C. (2008). The quality of institutions: a genetic programming approach. Economic Modelling, 25(1). doi: 10.1016/j.econmod. 2007.05.001.

Andreula, N., & Chong, A. (2016). Do good institutions improve fiscal transparency? Economics of Governance, 17. doi: 10.1007/s10101-015-0175-8.

Balcerzak, A. P. & Pietrzak, M. B. (2017). Human development and quality of institutions in highly developed countries. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, and U. Can (Eds.). Financial environment and business development. Proceedings of the 16th Eurasia Business and Economics Society. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-31939919-5_18.

Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. B. (2016). Quality of institutions for knowledge-based economy within new institutional economics framework. Multiple criteria decision analysis for European countries in the years 2000–2013. Economics & Sociology, 9(4). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-4/4.

Balcerzak, A. P. (2020). Quality of institutions in the European Union countries. Application of TOPSIS based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.1.2020.1.

Bel, G., & Fegeda, X. (2007). Why do local government privatise public services? A survey of empirical studies. Local Government Studies, 33(4). doi: 10.1080/ 03003930701417528.

Breen, M., & Gillanders, R. (2012). Corruption, institutions and regulation. Economics of Governance, 13. doi: 10.1007/s10101-012-0111-0.

Chong, A., & Calderón, C. (2000). Institutional quality and poverty measures in a cross-section of countries. Economics of Governance, 1. doi: 10.1007/PL0002 1678.

Chousa, J. P., Khan, H. A., Melikyan, D., & Tamazian A. (2005). Assessing institutional efficiency, growth and integration. Emerging Markets Review, 6(1). doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2004.09.004.

Evans, R., & Harding, A. (1997). Regionalisation, regional institutions and economic development. Policy and Politics, 25(1). doi: 10.1332/03055739778221 3765.

Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics, 88(3-4). doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00185-8.

Fried, R. C., & Rabinovitz, F. F. (1980). Comparative urban politics: a performance approach. Prentice Hall.

Geys, B. (2006). Looking across borders: a test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2006.04.002.

Gibbs, D., Jonas, A., Reimer, S., & Spooner, D. (2001). Governance, institutional capacity and partnerships in local economic development: theoretical issues and empirical evidence from the Humber sub-region. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(1). doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00008.

Gómes, G. M., Knorringa, P., & Corradi, A. A. (2016). Introduction. In G. M. Gomez & P. Knorringa (Eds.). Local governance, economic development and institution. Palgrave Macmillan.

Grigoli, F., & Mills, Z. (2014). Institutions and public investment: an empirical analysis. Economics of Governance, 15. doi: 10.1007/s10101-013-0137-y.

Hall, R., & Jones, C.I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1). doi: 10.1162/003355399555954.

Hardt, Ł. (2013). The idea of good (enough) governance. The view from complexity economics. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(31).

Herrera, E. W. (2016). Governance and development: the importance of legitimacy and institutional change. In G. M. Gomez & P. Knorringa (Eds.). Local governance, economic development and institution. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ignacy, J., & Kopyściański, T. (2011). Selection criteria of strategic goals for local governments. Argumenta Oeconomica, 2(27).

Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth without governance. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III. Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Governance matters. Policy research. Working Paper, 2196, doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2196.

Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics, 7(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x.

Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4). doi: 10.1162/003355300555475.

Law, S. H., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Economics of Governance, 13. doi: 10.1007/s10101 -012-0112-z.

MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale and explanation. Political Geography, 18(6). doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(99)00014-1.

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3). doi: 10.2307/2946696.

Miłek, D. (2018). Spatial differentiation in the social and economic development level in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3). doi: 10.24136/eq.2018.024.

Nowak, P. (2018). Regional variety in quality of life in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3). doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.019.

Piersiala, L. (2019). The usage pattern of development method to assess the functioning of special economic zones: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 14(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.2019.008.

Pomianek, I. (2014). Socio-economic development of agricultural problem areas in Poland. Economics & Sociology, 7(2). doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-2/18.

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti R. Y. (1995). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Rodric, D. (2003). In search of prosperity. Analytic narratives on economic growth. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Rodric, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institution over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2). doi: 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.

Rodrik, D. (1999). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4). doi: 10.1023/A: 1009863208706.

Savitch, H. V. (1998). Global challenge and institutional capacity or, how we can refit local administration for the next century. Administration & Society, 30(3). doi: 10.1177/0095399798303002.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37.

Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.019 00.x.

Tatarczak, A., & Boichuk, O. (2018). The multivariate techniques in evaluation of unemployment analysis of Polish regions. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(3). doi: 10.24136/oc.2018.018.

Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Recent and future management changes in local government: continuing focus on rationality and efficiency? Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00442.x.

Torres, L., Pina, V., & Yetano, A. (2011). Performance measurement in Spanish local governments. A cross-case comparison study. Public Administration, 89(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01919.x.

Vetter, A., & Kersting, N. (2003). Democracy versus efficiency? comparing local government reform across Europe. In N. Kersting & A. Vetter (Eds.). Reforming local government in Europe. Closing the gap between democracy and efficiency. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-11258-71.

Vincent, C., & Stephen, C. (2015). Local government capacity building and development: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 3(149).

Williams, D. (1997). Strategies of multinational enterprises and the development of the central and eastern European economies. European Business Review, 97(3). doi: 10.1108/09555349710167549.

Wollmann, H. (2012). Local government reforms in (seven) European countries: between convergent and divergent, conflicting and complementary developments. Local Government Studies, 38(1). doi: 10.1080/0300393042000318030.

Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: implication for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2).

Downloads

Published

2020-09-07

How to Cite

Marks-Bielska, R., Lizińska, W., Wojarska, M., & Babuchowska, K. (2020). Institutional efficiency versus stability of local governments in basic areas of activity: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.021

Issue

Section

Articles