Sectoral determinants of sub-federal budget tax revenues: Russian case study
Keywords:sub-federal budgets, tax revenues, sectoral structure of economy, level of tax absorption, inter-regional inequality
Research background: The research is based on the assumption that the sectoral structure of economy has a significant impact on the level and dynamics of sub-federal budget tax revenues. It distinguishes the following sectoral determinants of tax revenues in regions: the levels of tax return and tax absorption, inflation and economic growth in various economic activities.
Purpose of the article: We aimed at assessment of contribution of economic activities and their determinants to the increase in tax revenues of sub-federal budgets of the Russian Federation in 2011?2015 compared to 2006?2010.
Methods: Development of a four-factor additive-multiplicative model of the tax revenue formation in regions, application of the proportional and logarithm methods of factor analysis to assessment of contribution of various activities and their determinants to increase in tax revenues of sub-federal budgets, evaluation of inter-regional inequality of tax revenues growth based on the weighted coefficient of variation, and decomposition of this inequality using the A. Shorrocks technique.
Findings & Value added: We identified activities that made the largest contribution to the increase in tax revenues of the Russian sub-federal budgets. We found that the inflation factor had a predominant positive effect on the growth of tax revenues, while the contribution of the economic growth factor was 4 times less; however, the situation in various activities differed significantly. Generally, changes of sectoral levels of tax return and tax absorption influenced negatively the regional tax revenues. In addition, they moved in opposite direction in the regions. Ultimately, the uneven change in tax returns and price levels in the mining and manufacturing activities of Russian regions made the greatest contribution to inter-regional inequality of the growth of sub-federal budgets tax revenues.
Andrejovská, A., & Puliková, V. (2018). Tax revenues in the context of economic determinants. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(1). doi: 10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-1.10.
Bizioli, G., & Sacchetto, C. (Eds). (2011). Tax aspects of fiscal federalism: a comparative analysis. Netherlands: IBFD.
Braun, B. M., & Otsuka, Y. (1998). The effects of economic conditions and tax structures on state tax revenue flow. IAER, 4(3). doi: 10.1007/BF02294895.
Carrol, D. (2009). Diversifying municipal government revenue structures: fiscal illusion or instability? Public Budgeting and Finance, 29(1). doi: 10.1111/j. 1540-5850.2009.00922.x.
Castro, G. Á., & Camarillo, D. B. R. (2014). Determinants of tax revenue in OECD countries over the period 2001–2011. Contaduría y Administración, 53(3). doi: 10.1016/S0186-1042(14)71265-3.
Clausing, K. A. (2007). Corporate tax revenues in OECD countries. International Tax and Public Finance, 14(2). doi: 10.1007/s10797-006-7983-2.
Das-Gupta, A., & Gang, I. N. (2000). Decomposing revenue effects of tax evasion and tax structure changes. International Tax and Public Finance, 7(2). doi: 10.1023/A:1008704520816.
Heim, J. J. (2017). Determinants of government receipts. In J. J. Heim. An econometric model of the US economy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50681-4_14.
Karagöz, K. (2013). Determinants of tax revenue: does sectorial composition matter? Journal of Finance, Accounting and Management, 4(2).
Mahdavi, S. (2008). The level and composition of tax revenue in developing countries: evidence from unbalanced panel data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 17(4). doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2008.01.001.
Malkina, M. Yu. (2016). Evaluation of the factors of Russian regions’ convergence / divergence in the level of budget provision based on the decomposition of the Theil-Bernoulli index. Spatial Economics, 3. doi: 10.14530/se.2016.3.016-037. (In Russian).
Malkina, M. Yu., & Balakin, R. V. (2016). A factor analysis of changes in tax revenues for certain taxes in the Russian federation in 2006–2014. Finance and Credit, 32(704).
Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Timofeev, A. (2014). Intra-regional equalization and growth in Russia. Comparative Economic Studies, 53(3). doi: 10.1057/ces. 2014.7.
Mishustin, M. V. (2016). Factors of growth of tax revenues: a macroeconomic approach. Economic Policy, 11(5).
Ohno, T., Hotei, M., Sato, E., & Umezaki, C. (2015). Decomposition of the variation of corporate tax revenues: based on consideration of corporate tax paradox. Public Policy Review, 11(2).
Serkah, M., & Abizadeh, S. (2005). Economic growth and tax components: an analysis of tax changes in OECD. Applied Economics, 37(19). doi: 10.1080/ 00036840500293813.
Sharma, P., & Singh, J. (2015). Determinants of tax-revenue in India: a principal component analysis approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 10(1). doi: 10.1504/IJEBR.2015.070268.
Shorrocks, A. F. (1982). Inequality decomposition by Factor Components. Econometrica, 50(1).
Yushkov, A. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: theory, empirics, and the Russian experience. Russian Journal of Economics, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.ruje.2016.02.004.
Zhang, J. (2016). Does a tax-sharing system make sense? Understanding China’s growth miracle. In J. Zhang. End of hyper growth in China? New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-53718-8_2.