Main Article Content
Research background: The conducted empirical research on the influence of the degree of ownership concentration in the employee–owned companies on their sales revenues thematically fits into the issue of efficiency of the direct privatisation method, in particular giving a state–owned enterprise for use against payment.
Purpose of the article: The main goal of this article is to verify the research hypothesis stating that in employee–owned companies an increase in the degree of ownership concentration leads to an increase in sales revenues.
Methods: The empirical studies were carried out on a sample of 15 employee-owned companies from Mazowieckie Province, which concluded the agreement of giving a state–owned enterprise for use against payment from 2000 to 2004 and using the data from financial statements handed in by these entities to the National Court Register for a ten–year period after the privatisation year. The verification of research hypothesis was based on the estimation of a Cobb–Douglas production function by Ordinary Least Squares method for two variants, differing in the way of measuring the degree of ownership concentration in investigated employee–owned companies.
Findings & Value added: The research hypothesis formulated in this paper was verified negatively as the increase in the degree of ownership concentration in employee–owned companies caused the decrease in their sales revenues. The conducted empirical research also suggests that sales revenues in examined employee–owned companies peak at some intermediate/optimal level of ownership concentration.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Act of December 5, 2002 amending the Act on Principles of Exercising Rights due to the State Treasury, the Act on Commercialization and Privatization of State-owned Enterprises and Some Other Acts. Journal of Laws 2002, no 240, item 2055 with subsequent amendments.
Akimova, I., & Schwödiauer, G. (2004). Ownership structure, corporate governance and enterprise performance: empirical results for Ukraine. International Advances in Economic Research, 10(1). doi: 10.1007/BF02295575.
Asselain B., & Mould, R. F. (2010). Methodology of the Cox proportional hazards model. Nowotwory Journal of Oncology, 60(5).
Baehr, J. (1993). The company with equity participation of employees. Warsaw/Poznan: Polish Publishing House „Ławica”.
Błaszczyk, B. (2002). The phenomenon of secondary privatization – changes in the ownership structure of state–owned enterprises. In M. Bałtowski (Ed.). Privatized enterprises in the Polish economy. Warsaw: WN PWN.
Błaszczyk, B., & Woodward, R. (2001). Secondary privatisation: the evolution of ownership structures of privatised enterprises. Case Reports. Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research, 50. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1432339.
Bojar, E., Sosińska–Wit, M., & Żminda Z. (2003). Employee leasing and restructuring of enterprises. Lublin: Lublin University of Technology.
Bojar, E., & Sosińska–Wit, M. (1999). Employee leasing as a factor in the development of an enterprise. In R. Borowiecki (Ed.). Development challenges and restructuring of enterprises. Warsaw–Cracow: Cracow University of Economics, TNOiK, European Council of Management-CECIOS.
Bukowska–Piestrzyńska, A. (2002). Leasing of property of the State Treasury in workers’ companies. Economics and Organization of Enterprise, 5.
Christev, A., & FitzRoy, F. (2001). Employment and wage adjustment: insider-outsider control in a Polish privatization panel study. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(2). doi: 10.1006/jcec.2002.1775.
Conte, M. A., & Svejnar, J. (1988). Productivity effects of worker participation in management, profit-sharing, worker ownership of assets and unionization in U.S. Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6(1). doi: 10.1016/0167-7187(88)90011-2.
Daraghma, Z. M. A., & Alsinawi, A. A. (2010). Board of directors, management ownership, and capital structure and its effect on performance: the case of Palestine Securities Exchange. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(11). doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v5n11p118.
Estrin, S., Jones, C., & Svejnar, J. (1987). The productivity effects of worker participation: producer cooperatives in Western economies. Managerial and Decision Economics, 11(1). doi: 10.1016/0147-5967(87)90040-0.
Faleye, O., Mehrotra, V., & Morck, R. (2006). When labour has a voice in corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(3). doi: 10.1017/S0022109000002519.
Fazlzadeh, A., Hendi, A. T., & Mahboubi, K. (2011). The examination of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance in listed firms of Tehran Stock Exchange based on the type of the industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3). doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v6n3p249.
Fooladi M. (2012). Board characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 8(5).
Górka, K. (1991). Employee self-government in the privatization process of state–owned enterprises. In R. Borowiecki (Ed.). Directions of ownership transformation in the economy. The theoretical and practical aspect. Cracow: TNOiK.
Goszka, W. (2001). The structure of ownership and power in employees’ partnerships. Economics and Organization of Enterprise, 5.
Goszka, W., & Popławski, W. (2001). Ownership structure of capital and its impact on the basic economic factors of the enterprise based on employee–owned companies in the Kujawsko-Pomorskie region. In Corporate value management and shareholder structure. Warsaw: CeDeWu.
Grosfeld, I., & Nivet, J. (1999). Insider power and wage setting in transition: evidence from a panel of large Polish firms, 1988–1994. European Economic Review, 43(4-6). doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00121-4.
Harbaugh, R. (2005). The effect of employee stock ownership on wage and employment bargaining. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2005.04.002.
Jarosz, M., & Kozak, M. (1995). Economic and social condition of employee-owned companies in the years 1991–1994. Conclusions. In M. Jarosz (Ed.). Lights and shadows of employee-owned companies in the years 1991–1994. Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
Jawłowski, A. (2001). Employee privatization. Transformations of companies and their crews. Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
Jelinek, K., & Stuerke, P. (2009). The non-linear relation between agency costs and managerial equity ownership: evidence of decreasing benefits of increasing ownership. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2). doi: 10.1108 /17439130910947886.
Jones, D. C. (1993). The productivity effects of employee ownership within command economies: evidence from Poland. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14(5). doi: 10.1002/mde.4090140511.
Kapopoulos, P., & Lazaretetou, S. (206). Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms. Bank of Greece. Economic Research Department – Social Studies Division, Working Paper, 37. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00551.x.
Karpińska–Mizielińska W., & Smuga, T. (1997). Changes of ownership relations and their impact on the improvement of long-term economic efficiency. Warsaw: Institute for Development and Strategic Studies.
Kim, E. H., & Ouimet, P. (2008). Employee capitalism or corporate socialism? Broad-based employee stock ownership. AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1107974.
Kozarzewski, P. (1998). Direct privatization: the legal status. In M. Jarosz (Ed.). Direct privatization. Investors. Managers. Employees. Warsaw: Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
Kozarzewski, P., & Woodward, R. (2001). Secondary privatization in Poland (Part I): evolution of ownership structure and company performance in firms privatized by employee buyouts. Case Reports. Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research, 40. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1432404.
Krajewski, S. (2001). Conflicts of interest after privatization. In M. Jarosz (Ed.). Intricacies of Polish privatization. Warsaw: WN PWN.
Kruse, D. L., Blasi, J. R., & Freeman R. B. (2012). Does linking worker pay to firm performance help the best firms do even better? NBER Working Paper, 17745. doi: 10.3386/w17745.
Labour Code of June 26, 1974. Journal of Laws 1998, no 21, item 94, with subsequent amendments.
Lee, S. (2008). Ownership structure and financial performance: evidence from panel data of South Korea. University of Utah, Department of Economics, Working Paper. 17. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ ijbm/article/viewFile/9717/6980 (09.03.2016).
Lexicon of privatization (1998). T. Zwierzyńska–Bubałło (Ed.). Warsaw: PWE.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2014). Investment commitments of employee–owned companies. Organization Review, 6.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2015a). Credits and loans as a source of financing for business activity of employee–owned companies. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie– Skłodowska, sectio H, 49(4). doi: 10.17951/h.2015.49.4.381.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2015b). Net profit distribution policy in companies using state–owned enterprises against payment. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2). doi: 10.12775/OeC.2015.014.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2015c). The debt of companies using assets of state–owned enterprises for a consideration towards the State Treasury. Lodz: Publisher of the University of Lodz.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2016a). Social commitments in employee–owned companies. Economic Studies. Scientific Papers of University of Economics in Katowice, 282/16.
Matuszewska–Pierzynka, A. (2016b). Wage pressure in employee–owned companies. Economic Studies. Scientific Papers of University of Economics in Katowice, 263/16.
Mickiewicz, T. (2002). Changes in the level of remuneration and wage pressure in enterprises in the transformation period. In M. Bałtowski (Ed.). Privatized enterprises in the Polish economy. Warsaw: WN PWN.
Nadratowska, A. (1990). Impact of individual forms of privatization on economic efficiency. In T. Kierczyński (Ed.). Joint stock company as a form of privatization of state–owned enterprises. Warsaw: Economic Consulting Company „Lege Artis”.
Ordinance of the Council of Ministers of December 14, 2004 on Terms of Payment for Amounts Due on the Use of the Enterprise. Journal of Laws 2004, no 269, item 2667.
Ordinance of the Council of Ministers of October 16, 1997 on Specific Rules for Determining the Amount Due for the Use of the Enterprise, the Method of Securing the Unpaid Part of the Debt and the Interest Rate of the Unpaid Payment. Journal of Laws 1997, no 130, item 855.
Pawłowski, J. (1999). The privatization lease vs. participation in a public company. In R. Borowiecki (Ed.). Development challenges and restructuring of enterprises. Warsaw–Cracow: Cracow University of Economics, TNOiK, European Council of Management-CECIOS.
Privatisation of state–owned companies in 2000 (1999). Warsaw: CSO.
Privatisation of state–owned companies in 2004 (2005), Warsaw: CSO.
Sanchez–Ballesta J., & Garcia–Meca E. (2007). A meta analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. Corporate Governance, 15(5). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00604.x.
Sosnowski, T. (2015). Time to the full exit from the investment of private equity funds on the Warsaw Stock Exchange Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie–Skłodowska, sectio H, 49(4). doi: 10.17951/h.2015.49.4.527.
Surdykowska, S. T. (1996). Privatisation. Warsaw: WN PWN.
Włodyka, S. (1996). Companies in the process of commercialization and privatization. In S. Włodyka (Ed.). Company law. Cracow: ISIZ.
Wrońska, E. M. (2004). Financial strategies of employee–owned companies. Lublin: Publisher of Maria Curie–Skłodowska University.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Agnieszka Matuszewska-Pierzynka, Net profit distribution policy in companies using state-owned enterprises against payment , Oeconomia Copernicana: Vol 6 No 2 (2015)