Main Article Content
Research background: Exchange-traded products (ETPs) are one of the most rapidly growing categories of financial products. Their fast development has been boosted by innovative features. Three main categories of ETPs are exchange-traded funds (ETFs), exchange-traded commodities (ETCs) and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). ETCs and ETNs remain least known, even though their number on some stock exchanges is high. In Europe, Germany is one of the largest and most active ETPs markets. ETCs and ETNs are debt instruments, in contrast with the most popular ETFs, which are equity securities. Therefore, they offer investors different advantages, but also expose them to other types of risks.
Purpose of the article: The key aim of the article is to present the features of ETPs and to provide in-depth insight into the issues linked with the development of ETPs market in Germany, with the special emphasis on the ETCs and ETNs.
Methods: In the main empirical part of the article, German ETPs market is analyzed using descriptive statistics and technological substitution framework (employed for the analysis of innovations in order to evaluate the changing market shares of, first, ETFs versus ETCs and ETNs, as well as, second, ETFs versus other types of investment funds). The period of the analysis is 2010–2016 in the former case and 2007–2016 in the latter.
Findings & Value added: Share of ETPs other than ETFs in the total market in Germany remains low. Even though the market position of the leading products, i.e. ETFs, is still very strong, some substitution has been observed, especially after 2015. Predictions indicate that this trend will continue in the upcoming years. The results of the analysis of the investment funds’ market confirm the substitution between ETFs and traditional investment funds over 2007–2017, in particular in the first years of this time period.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Agapova, A. (2011). Conventional mutual index funds versus exchange-traded funds. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(2). doi: 10.1016/j.finmar.2010.10.005.
Aroskar, R., & Ogden, W. A. (2012). An analysis of exchange traded notes tracking errors with their underlying indexes and indicative values. Applied Financial Economics, 22(24). doi: 10.1080/09603107.2012.684787.
Blitz, D., Huij, J., & Swinkels, L. (2012). The performance of European index funds and exchange‐traded funds. European Financial Management, 18(4). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x.
Charteris, A., Chau, F., Gavriilidis, K., & Kallinterakis, V. (2014). Premiums, discounts and feedback trading: evidence from emerging markets' ETFs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2014.07.010.
Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Frijns, B. (2017). Evaluating the tracking performance and tracking error of New Zealand exchange traded funds. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3). doi: 10.1108/PAR-10-2016-0089.
Cherry, J. (2004). The limits of arbitrage: evidence from exchange traded funds. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=628061 (12.08.2018).
Cserna, B., Levy, A., & Wiener, Z. (2013). Counterparty risk in exchange-traded notes (ETNs). Journal of Fixed Income, 23(1). doi: 10.3905/jfi.2013.23.1.076.
Curcio, R. J., Lipka, J. M., & Thornton, Jr., J. H. (2004). Cubes and the individual investor. Financial Services Review, 13.
Czuderna, K., Riedel, C., & Wagner, N. (2015). Liquidity and conditional market returns: evidence from German exchange traded funds. Economic Modelling, 51. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.028.
Dannhauser, C. D. (2017). The impact of innovation: evidence from corporate bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Journal of Financial Economics, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.002.
Deutsche Bank (2010). The race for assets in the European commodity exchange-traded products space. London.
Deutsche Bank (2015). European monthly ETF market review. London.
Deutsche Bank (2017). ETF annual review & outlook. London.
Elton, E., Gruber, M., Comer, G., & Li, K. (2002). Spiders: where are the bugs? Journal of Business, 75(3). doi:10.1086/339891.
ETFGI (2017). ETFGI global ETF and ETP industry highlights - December 2016. Retrieved from http://www.etfgi.com/publications/reports (22.03.2017).
Ferri, R. (2009). The ETF book: the ETF book: all you need to know about exchange-traded funds. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (2012). Investor alerts exchange-traded notes — avoid unpleasant surprises. Retrieved from http://www.finra.org/in vestors/alerts/exchange-traded-notes-avoid-surprises (20.03.2017).
Fisher, J. C., & Pry, R. H. (1972). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(71)80005-7.
Hill, J. M. (2013). The evolution and success of index strategies in ETFs. Financial Analyst Journal, 72(5). doi: 10.2469/faj.v72.n5.2.
Hill, J. M., Nadig, D., Hougan, M., & Fuhr, D. (2015). A comprehensive guide to exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Charlottesville, VA: CFA Institute Research Foundation.
Hilliard, J. (2017). Premiums and discounts in ETFs: an analysis of the arbitrage mechanism in domestic and international funds. Global Finance Journal, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2014.06.001.
Hull, I. (2016). The development and spread of financial innovations. Quantitative Economics, 7. doi:10.3982/QE521.
Ivanov, S. I. (2016). Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 61. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.02.004.
Krause, T., & Tse, Y. (2013). Volatility and return spillovers in Canadian and U.S. industry ETFs. International Review of Economics and Finance, 25. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.009.
Kucharavy, D., & De Guio, R. (2011). Logistic substitution model and technological forecasting. Procedia Engineering, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.129.
Kwaśnicki, W. (2013). Logistic growth of the global economy and competitiveness of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1). doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.007.
Lechman, E. (2015). ICT diffusion in developing countries. Towards a new concept of technological takeoff. Springer. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-319-18254-4.
Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2015). ICT technologies and financial innovations: the case of Exchange Traded Funds in Brazil, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.006.
Lechman, E., & Marszk, A. (2018). Tracing financial innovation diffusion and substitution trajectories. Recent evidence on exchange-traded funds in Japan and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.003
Lettau, M., & Madhavan, A. (2018). Exchange-Traded Funds 101 for Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.1257/jep.32.1.135.
Leung, T., & Santoli, M. (2016). Leveraged exchange-traded funds: price dynamics and options valuation. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29094-2.
Lin, J.-C. (2016). Does the inverse exchange-traded fund trading convey a bearish signal to the market?. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(2-2). doi:10.21511/imfi.13(2-2).2016.02.
MacManus, C., & Lee, J. (2017). The growth of ETFs in Europe. Performance Magazine, 22.
Madhavan, A. (2012). Exchange-traded funds, market structure, and the flash crash. Financial Analyst Journal, 68(4). doi: 10.2469/faj.v68.n4.6.
Marchetti, C., & Nakicenovic, N. (1979). The dynamics of energy systems and the logistic substitution model. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2013). ETF arbitrage: intraday evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin. 2013.05.014.
Marshall, B. R., Nguyen, N. H., & Visaltanachoti, N. (2018). Do liquidity proxies measure liquidity accurately in ETFs? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin. 2018.02.011.
Marszk, A., Lechman, E., & Kaur, H. (2017). Financial markets diffusion patterns. The case of Mexican investment funds. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(1). doi: 10.24136/eq.v12i1.5.
Meyer, P. S., Yung, J. W., & Ausubel, J. H. (1999). A primer on logistic growth and substitution: the mathematics of the Loglet Lab software. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61(3). doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00021-9.
Petajisto, A. (2017). Inefficiencies in the pricing of exchange-traded funds. Financial Analyst Journal, 73(1). doi: 10.2469/faj.v73.n1.7.
Shank, C. A., & Vianna, A. C. (2016). Are US-Dollar-Hedged-ETF investors aggressive on exchange rates? A panel VAR approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.05.002.
Vandermarliere, B., Ryckebusch, J., Schoors, K., Cauwelsc, P., & Sornette, D. (2017). Discrete hierarchy of sizes and performances in the exchange-traded fund universe. Physica A., 469. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.084.
Xetra (2017). Monthly statistics Cash Market. Retrieved from http://www.deuts che-boerse-cash-market.com/dbcm-en/instruments-statistics/statistics/cash-mar ket-statistics/monthly-statistics-cash-market (20.03.2017).
Yiannaki, S. M. (2015). ETFs performance Europe - a good start or not? Procedia Economics and Finance, 30. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01346-5.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Adam Marszk, Ewa Lechman, Harleen Kaur, Financial markets diffusion patterns. The case of Mexican investment funds , Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy: Vol 12 No 1 (2017)