The model of municipal education expenditures in Poland. Policy, budget and demography

Main Article Content

Beata Guziejewska
Anna Majdzińska

Abstract

Research background: Municipal education expenditures finance the delivery of one of the key public services devolved by central government to lower levels of government. Traditional studies in this field are divided based on whether they consider socio-economic determinants or political factors within the new political economy. The study presented herein was undertaken to explore the role of demo-graphic factors which are frequently ignored in research.


Purpose of the article: This study seeks to identify which variables statistically significantly influence the level of education expenditures in municipalities. The empirical investigation is based on a sample of 2478 Polish municipalities and uses the 2016 Central Statistical Office data to analyse the correlations and regressions between municipal education expenditures and selected economic and socio-demographic factors.


Methods: The parameters of the power and exponential model are estimated using the Generalised Least Squares Method.


Findings & Value added: The results of the statistical analysis have shown a moderate, positive and significant correlation between municipalities’ own revenue per capita and local share of education funding per capita. According to the regression analysis results, the model’s explanatory variables accounted for 61% of the variance in municipal education expenditures per capita. The added value of the study is that it highlights the educational challenges related to the demographic situation in Poland that public authorities will soon have to address.

Article Details

How to Cite
Guziejewska, B., & Majdzińska, A. (2018). The model of municipal education expenditures in Poland. Policy, budget and demography. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3), 523-541. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.026
Section
Articles

References

Ahmad, E., & Brosio., G. (Eds.) (2015). Handbook of multilevel finance. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ahmad, E., & Brosio, G. (Eds.) (2009). Does decentralization enhance service de- livery and poverty reduction. Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State-Local Finance. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Edgar Publishing.
Beramendi, P. (2012). The political geography of inequality. Regions and re-distribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bewley, T. (1981). A critique of Tiebout’s theory of local public expenditures. Econometrica, 49.
Boyne, G. A. (1990). Central grants and local policy variation. Public Administration, 68.
Blöchliger, H., & Vammalle, K. (2012). Reforming fiscal federalism and local government: beyond the zero-sum game. OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264119970-1-en.
Central Statistical Office of Poland (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). Local Data Bank. Information Portal 2005–2016. Warsaw.
Gramlich, E. (1977). Intergovernmental grants: a review of the empirical literature. In W. Oates (Ed.). The political economy of fiscal federalism. Lexington: Mass: D.C. Heath.
Grob, U., & Wolter, S. C. (2005). Demographic change and public education spending. A conflict between young and old? CESifo Working Paper, 1555.
Hillman, A. L. (2009). Public finance and public policy. Responsibilities and limitations of government. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., Navarro Galera, A., Alcaide Muñoz, L., & López Subirés, M. D. (2016). Risk factors and drivers of financial sustainability in local government: an empirical study. Local Government Studies, 42(1).
King, D. S. (1984). Fiscal tiers: the economics of multi-level government. London: Allen & Unwin.
Mäding, H. (2017). Demographic change and local government finance – trends and expectations. Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik. Retrieved from https://difu.de (10.07.2017).
Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Poterba, J. M. (1997). Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1).
Rusmin, R., Astami, E. W., & Scilly, G. (2014). Local government units in Indonesia: demographic attributes and differences in financial condition. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(2). doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v8i2.7.
Sacmann, R., Bartl, W., Jonda, B., Kopycka, K., & Rademacher, Ch. (2015). Coping with demographic change: a comparative view on education and local government in Germany and Poland. Switzerland: Springer International Pub-lishing.
Smith, S. M., Bryson, P. J., & Cornia, G. C. (2010). Intergovernmental fiscal relations in the Czech Republic. A survey of municipality expenditure patterns. Eastern European Economics, 48(2).
Stiglitz, J. S. (1983). Public goods in open economies with heterogeneous individuals. In J. T. Thisse & H. G. Zoller (Eds.). Location analysis of public facilities. New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An empirical typology of local government systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2).
Tiebout, Ch. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditure. Journal of political economy, 64.
Wise, D. A. (Ed.) (1994). Studies in the economics of aging. National Bureau of Economic Research. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from www.nber.org/books/wise94-1 (11.08.2018).
Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19.